[Previous] Judgement Day...

 [Next] Do not respond to this email!...

Some related posts from Technorati and Google.

 [Bespacific.com] beSpacific: E-Government Archives: "A cross-partisan group of registered Maryland voters announced today they will be filing a lawsuit against the Maryland State Board of Elections and its Administrator, charging that the new Diebold AccuVote-TS electronic voting machines recently purchased by Maryland fail to comply with both state and federal law. The lawsuit - to be filed on Thursday in Anne Arundel County Circuit Court - would force state election officials to decertify the electronic machines until the manufacturer, Ohio-based Diebold Election Systems, remedies well-publicized security vulnerabilities in the new machines and institutes a voter-verified paper audit trail." [a copy of the complaint, in pdf, is here]

[E.finland.fi] eFinland | European Countries Launch Joint Drive to Combat “Spam ...: of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources and the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner, Italy’s Data Protection Authority, Lithuania’s State Data Protection Inspectorate, Malta’s Office of the Commissioner for Data Protection, the Netherlands’ electronic communications regulator (OPTA) and Data Protection Authority (CBP), and the Spanish Data Protection Authority.

 [Spy.org.uk] Spy Blog: The War on Tourism Archives: Friend has in protecting the public from British people whom he believes to be a terrorist threat, when, almost by definition, the intelligence that informs him of that is not admissible in court, but I ask him to bear it in mind that there is a whole range of powers currently in statute that have not yet been brought into force, which could help, including in particular, in the Criminal Justice Act 2003, the admissibility of hearsay, which can be second-hand, third-hand or written evidence from abroad. Using that provision could transform the picture.

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, E-Government, E-Business Library